DRNZ vs. DFNS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L).
DRNZ and DFNS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRNZ is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the VettaFi Drone Index. It was launched on Oct 29, 2025. DFNS.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023. Both DRNZ and DFNS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 9.89% | -10.89% |
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 6.45% | -4.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than DFNS.L's 6.45% return.
DRNZ
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNS.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 48.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRNZ
DFNS.L
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRNZ | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 2.28 | -2.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNZ and DFNS.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRNZ nor DFNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, which is greater than DFNS.L's maximum drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and DFNS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNZ | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -14.92% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -12.94% | -4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -2.91% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility
DRNZ vs. DFNS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRNZ | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.35% | 25.60% | +25.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.35% | 21.07% | +30.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.35% | 21.07% | +30.28% |