DRI vs. AFL
DRI (Darden Restaurants, Inc.) and AFL (Aflac Incorporated) are both stocks. DRI operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while AFL operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, DRI returned 15.28%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for AFL. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DRI vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRI achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 13.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DRI having a 15.28% annualized return and AFL not far ahead at 15.59%.
DRI
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- -4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.57%
AFL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.31%
DRI vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc. | 8.35% | 1.56% | 17.70% | 22.83% | -4.84% | 29.48% | 10.45% | 12.29% | 6.89% | 35.99% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 13.71% | 8.94% | 28.08% | 17.36% | 26.41% | 34.55% | -13.60% | 18.55% | 6.20% | 29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRI and AFL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 1995 | 0.32 |
The correlation between DRI and AFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DRI:
$22.30B
AFL:
$63.15B
DRI:
$10.35
AFL:
$8.81
DRI:
18.82
AFL:
14.09
DRI:
2.11
AFL:
3.65
DRI:
1.72
AFL:
3.58
DRI:
10.17
AFL:
2.85
DRI:
$13.21B
AFL:
$18.22B
DRI:
$9.17B
AFL:
$8.70B
DRI:
$2.34B
AFL:
$6.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRI vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank
DRI
AFL
DRI vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRI | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.69 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 7.07 | -7.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRI vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRI drawdown since its inception was -72.80%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRI and AFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRI | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.80% | -82.71% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.07% | -9.11% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.92% | -13.56% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.38% | -19.86% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.80% | -54.89% | -17.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.35% | -0.51% | -9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -11.63% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 3.47% | +5.80% |
Volatility
DRI vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.24%. This indicates that DRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRI | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 5.24% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | 12.54% | +6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.80% | 17.13% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 20.80% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.97% | 25.73% | +10.24% |
Dividends
DRI vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
DRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than AFL's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 1.92% | 2.10% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% |
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc. | 3.14% | 3.15% | 2.90% | 3.07% | 3.34% | 2.29% | 0.99% | 2.99% | 2.76% | 2.48% | 2.92% | 13.76% |
Financials
DRI vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Darden Restaurants, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DRI and AFL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRI has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to AFL (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRI dropped -72.80% vs AFL's -82.71%.
AFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRI and AFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer