DRH vs. CLDT
DRH (DiamondRock Hospitality Company) and CLDT (Chatham Lodging Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Hotel & Motel industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, DRH returned 5.21%/yr vs -3.11%/yr for CLDT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DRH vs. CLDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRH achieves a 26.89% return, which is significantly lower than CLDT's 63.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DRH has outperformed CLDT with an annualized return of 5.21%, while CLDT has yielded a comparatively lower -3.11% annualized return.
DRH
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 26.89%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- 54.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
CLDT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 28.12%
- YTD
- 63.32%
- 6M
- 66.94%
- 1Y
- 61.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- -3.11%
DRH vs. CLDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRH DiamondRock Hospitality Company | 26.89% | 3.66% | -0.35% | 16.35% | -13.80% | 16.48% | -25.54% | 29.77% | -16.84% | 2.43% |
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 63.32% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 27.04% | -40.30% | 11.32% | -17.05% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRH and CLDT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2010 | 0.67 |
The correlation between DRH and CLDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DRH:
$2.33B
CLDT:
$518.82M
DRH:
$0.50
CLDT:
$0.19
DRH:
22.44
CLDT:
58.97
DRH:
2.08
CLDT:
1.83
DRH:
1.61
CLDT:
0.72
DRH:
$1.12B
CLDT:
$293.94M
DRH:
$483.67M
CLDT:
-$10.45M
DRH:
$279.39M
CLDT:
$80.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRH vs. CLDT — Risk / Return Rank
DRH
CLDT
DRH vs. CLDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRH | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 3.28 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 7.45 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRH | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.01 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.05 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | -0.07 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.01 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
DRH vs. CLDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRH drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CLDT drawdown of -83.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRH and CLDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRH | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -83.52% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -18.75% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.90% | -41.89% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.93% | -55.84% | +17.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.97% | -81.52% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -45.20% | +42.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -33.35% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 8.26% | -3.64% |
Volatility
DRH vs. CLDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) is 7.48%, while Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that DRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRH | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 13.60% | -6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.99% | 23.97% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.95% | 30.61% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 33.08% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.76% | 43.07% | +3.69% |
Dividends
DRH vs. CLDT - Dividend Comparison
DRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than CLDT's 3.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 3.37% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
DRH DiamondRock Hospitality Company | 3.29% | 4.02% | 3.54% | 1.28% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 4.13% | 4.43% | 4.34% | 5.18% |
Financials
DRH vs. CLDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DiamondRock Hospitality Company and Chatham Lodging Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DRH vs. CLDT - Profitability Comparison
DRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 258.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 258.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CLDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
DRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported a net income of 14.46M and revenue of 258.16M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
CLDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRH and CLDT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLDT has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to DRH (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRH dropped -86.50% vs CLDT's -83.52%.
DRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRH and CLDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer