PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRH vs. CLDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DRH vs. CLDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRH achieves a 26.89% return, which is significantly lower than CLDT's 63.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DRH has outperformed CLDT with an annualized return of 5.21%, while CLDT has yielded a comparatively lower -3.11% annualized return.


DRH

1D
0.72%
1M
10.07%
YTD
26.89%
6M
29.58%
1Y
54.07%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
5.21%

CLDT

1D
-0.81%
1M
28.12%
YTD
63.32%
6M
66.94%
1Y
61.28%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
-1.57%
10Y*
-3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRH vs. CLDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRH
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
26.89%3.66%-0.35%16.35%-13.80%16.48%-25.54%29.77%-16.84%2.43%
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
63.32%-19.89%-13.83%-10.13%-10.05%27.04%-40.30%11.32%-17.05%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DRH and CLDT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2010

0.67

The correlation between DRH and CLDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DRH:

$2.33B

CLDT:

$518.82M

EPS

DRH:

$0.50

CLDT:

$0.19

PE Ratio

DRH:

22.44

CLDT:

58.97

PS Ratio

DRH:

2.08

CLDT:

1.83

PB Ratio

DRH:

1.61

CLDT:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

DRH:

$1.12B

CLDT:

$293.94M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DRH:

$483.67M

CLDT:

-$10.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

DRH:

$279.39M

CLDT:

$80.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRH vs. CLDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRH
DRH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CLDT
CLDT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CLDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CLDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRH vs. CLDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRHCLDTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

2.01

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

3.32

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

3.28

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.73

7.45

+4.29

DRH vs. CLDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRH Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the CLDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRH and CLDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRHCLDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.01

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.05

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

-0.07

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.01

+0.07

Drawdowns

DRH vs. CLDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRH drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CLDT drawdown of -83.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRH and CLDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRHCLDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.50%

-83.52%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-18.75%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.90%

-41.89%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.93%

-55.84%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.97%

-81.52%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-45.20%

+42.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-33.35%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.62%

8.26%

-3.64%

Volatility

DRH vs. CLDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) is 7.48%, while Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that DRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRHCLDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

13.60%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.99%

23.97%

-5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.95%

30.61%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.31%

33.08%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.76%

43.07%

+3.69%

Dividends

DRH vs. CLDT - Dividend Comparison

DRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than CLDT's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.37%5.29%3.13%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%
DRH
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
3.29%4.02%3.54%1.28%1.10%0.00%0.00%5.64%4.13%4.43%4.34%5.18%

Financials

DRH vs. CLDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DiamondRock Hospitality Company and Chatham Lodging Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
258.16M
67.50M
(DRH) Total Revenue
(CLDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DRH vs. CLDT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DiamondRock Hospitality Company and Chatham Lodging Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
DRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 258.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CLDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 258.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CLDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 1.64M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.

DRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DiamondRock Hospitality Company reported a net income of 14.46M and revenue of 258.16M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

CLDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of -4.42M and revenue of 67.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DRH and CLDT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLDT has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to DRH (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRH dropped -86.50% vs CLDT's -83.52%.

DRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRH and CLDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer