DRGN vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DRGN returned 44.44% vs -0.89% for FLCH. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRGN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

DRGN vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRGN achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -8.52% return.

DRGN

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: -0.75%
• YTD: 14.26%
• 1Y: 44.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -1.40%
• 6M: -13.12%
• YTD: -8.52%
• 1Y: -0.89%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: -4.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGN vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	14.26%	26.96%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-8.52%	10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DRGN and FLCH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.64

The correlation between DRGN and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRGN vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRGN

DRGN Risk / Return Rank: 42
DRGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DRGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DRGN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DRGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DRGN Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRGN vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRGN	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.05	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	0.07	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.01	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	-0.04	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	-0.09	+4.54

DRGN vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRGN and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRGN vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRGN	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-62.09%	+41.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.86%	-21.48%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.88%	-35.52%	+26.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-30.60%	+22.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.02%	9.59%	+0.43%

Volatility

DRGN vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.01%. This indicates that DRGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRGN	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.08%	6.01%	+7.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.46%	13.73%	+11.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.74%	19.69%	+16.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.74%	29.59%	+6.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.74%	27.81%	+7.93%

DRGN vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRGN vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than FLCH's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.06%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.37%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRGN and FLCH in my portfolio?

DRGN and FLCH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRGN or FLCH?

DRGN has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to FLCH (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRGN dropped -20.86% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, DRGN or FLCH?

On 1-year performance, DRGN leads with 44.44% vs -0.89% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRGN or FLCH?

Over the 1-year period, DRGN has performed better with a 44.44% return vs -0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRGN or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DRGN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRGN or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.06% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between DRGN and FLCH?

DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.