DRGN vs. ARMH
DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. DRGN is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRGN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
DRGN vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRGN
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | -2.90% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 17.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGN and ARMH is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRGN vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRGN vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGN | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -24.85% | +3.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.84% | -18.04% | +7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -8.26% | +0.19% |
Volatility
DRGN vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRGN | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.15% | 119.19% | -84.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 119.19% | -84.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 119.19% | -84.04% |
DRGN vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRGN vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.09% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRGN and ARMH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DRGN.
DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Themes and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for DRGN and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer