DRES vs. VIS
DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRES is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. DRES is actively managed, while VIS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VIS.
Performance
DRES vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 17.98% return.
DRES
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIS
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- YTD
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
DRES vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 20.22% | 2.50% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 17.98% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRES and VIS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRES vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
DRES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VIS
DRES vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRES | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRES vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRES | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -63.51% | +53.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -2.77% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -8.34% | +6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility
DRES vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRES | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.34% | 17.71% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 18.54% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 20.45% | -2.11% |
DRES vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRES vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.53% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRES and VIS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.
VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.53% for DRES.
DRES is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.09% for VIS.
Find the right allocation for DRES and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer