DRES vs. PWC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. DRES is actively managed, while PWC is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.

Performance

DRES vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.00% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 5.85% return.

DRES

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 20.00%
• 6M: 18.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWC

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRES vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	20.00%	2.65%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	5.85%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DRES and PWC is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

DRES vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWC

PWC Risk / Return Rank: 25
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRES vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRES	PWC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	0.11	+1.89

Drawdowns

DRES vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and PWC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRES	PWC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-78.13%	+67.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.37%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-36.21%	+33.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRES	PWC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	9.75%	+8.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.37%	16.07%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	18.81%	-0.44%

DRES vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRES vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than PWC's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.30%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	1.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRES and PWC in my portfolio?

DRES and PWC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRES or PWC?

On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRES or PWC?

DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRES or PWC?

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.

What is the main difference between DRES and PWC?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.60% for PWC.