PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRES vs. GMOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRES vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly higher than GMOD's 6.36% return.


DRES

1D
-1.32%
1M
2.97%
YTD
19.60%
6M
16.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMOD

1D
-0.88%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
6.36%
6M
6.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRES vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
19.60%2.32%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
6.36%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DRES and GMOD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRES vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRES vs. GMOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRES vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than GMOD's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and GMOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRESGMODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-6.50%

-3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.51%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-1.13%

-1.07%

Volatility

DRES vs. GMOD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRESGMODDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

9.07%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

9.07%

+9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

9.07%

+9.46%

DRES vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRES and GMOD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

DRES vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison

DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GMOD's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
0.30%0.22%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
0.88%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRES and GMOD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRES and GMOD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.

DRES is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GMOD is Tactical Allocation.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRES and GMOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer