DRAM vs. TDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. DRAM is actively managed, while TDV is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.

Performance

DRAM vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 64.14%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 10.03%
• YTD: 23.09%
• 6M: 21.07%
• 1Y: 36.07%
• 3Y*: 20.49%
• 5Y*: 13.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	151.12%
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF	24.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and TDV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026	0.44

DRAM vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRAM	TDV
Technology	100.0%	90.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	4.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	5.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRAM vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDV

TDV Risk / Return Rank: 65
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAM vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRAM	TDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	341.95	0.76	+341.20

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum TDV drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and TDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAM	TDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-32.78%	+22.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.55%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-5.36%	+3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAM	TDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.92%	17.29%	+56.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.92%	20.45%	+53.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.92%	23.20%	+50.72%

DRAM vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAM vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF	0.93%	1.09%	1.16%	1.16%	1.67%	1.08%	1.10%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRAM and TDV in my portfolio?

DRAM and TDV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRAM or TDV?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAM or TDV?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAM or TDV?

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between DRAM and TDV?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.66% for TDV.