DRAM vs. STHH
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. DRAM is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
DRAM vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- -14.25%
- 1M
- 31.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- -8.12%
- 1M
- 10.72%
- YTD
- 187.72%
- 6M
- 187.07%
- 1Y
- 158.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 156.37% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 112.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and STHH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STHH
DRAM vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAM | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -33.89% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.25% | -8.12% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -10.17% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.93% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.22% | 52.67% | +40.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.22% | 51.51% | +41.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.22% | 51.51% | +41.71% |
DRAM vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.70% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAM and STHH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.19% for STHH.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer