DRAM vs. PWRD
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.
Performance
DRAM vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 140.78% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 14.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and PWRD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -14.12% | -5.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -1.91% | -4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -3.18% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DRAM vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.02% | 24.91% | +62.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.02% | 24.91% | +62.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.02% | 24.91% | +62.11% |
DRAM vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRAM nor PWRD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAM and PWRD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
DRAM and PWRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.75% for PWRD.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer