PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAM vs. PWRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAM vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAM

1D
-0.17%
1M
19.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PWRD

1D
1.68%
1M
0.32%
YTD
18.40%
6M
18.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
140.78%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and PWRD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAM vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAM vs. PWRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and PWRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAMPWRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.97%

-14.12%

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.74%

-1.91%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-3.18%

+0.12%

Volatility

DRAM vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAMPWRDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.02%

24.91%

+62.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.02%

24.91%

+62.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.02%

24.91%

+62.11%

DRAM vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAM vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRAM nor PWRD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAM and PWRD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

DRAM and PWRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.75% for PWRD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and PWRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer