DRAM vs. MAGY
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGY.
Performance
DRAM vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- -14.25%
- 1M
- 31.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -7.24%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 156.37% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and MAGY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.51 |
DRAM vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAM
MAGY
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRAM
MAGY
-
Basic Materials
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Communication Services
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Consumer Defensive
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Energy
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Financial Services
DRAM
-
MAGY
Healthcare
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Industrials
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Real Estate
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Utilities
DRAM
-
MAGY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGY
DRAM vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAM | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and MAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -14.29% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.25% | -9.54% | -4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -2.88% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.22% | 15.38% | +77.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.22% | 15.45% | +77.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.22% | 15.45% | +77.77% |
DRAM vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 40.01% | 23.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAM and MAGY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 40.01%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while MAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.99% for MAGY.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and MAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer