DRAM vs. EUV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EUV.

Performance

DRAM vs. EUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAM

• 1D: 5.23%
• 1M: 52.82%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EUV

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 12.98%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. EUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	74.38%
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	17.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and EUV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.76

Return for Risk

DRAM vs. EUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. EUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, which is greater than EUV's maximum drawdown of -10.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and EUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAM	EUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.97%	-10.51%	-9.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-3.26%	+0.37%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAM	EUV	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.28%	61.99%	+25.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.28%	61.99%	+25.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.28%	61.99%	+25.29%

DRAM vs. EUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EUV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAM vs. EUV - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRAM nor EUV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRAM and EUV in my portfolio?

DRAM and EUV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRAM or EUV?

On fees, EUV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAM or EUV?

EUV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAM or EUV?

DRAM and EUV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRAM and EUV?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Corgi Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.35% for EUV.