DOGZ vs. WGS
DOGZ (Dogness (International) Corporation) and WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. DOGZ operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while WGS operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, DOGZ returned -52.93%/yr vs -29.44%/yr for WGS. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DOGZ vs. WGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOGZ achieves a -91.67% return, which is significantly lower than WGS's -49.94% return.
DOGZ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -18.99%
- 6M
- -15.90%
- YTD
- -91.67%
- 1Y
- -88.41%
- 3Y*
- -60.70%
- 5Y*
- -52.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.25%
WGS
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -32.36%
- YTD
- -49.94%
- 1Y
- -35.92%
- 3Y*
- 104.44%
- 5Y*
- -29.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.01K | $28.41K | $428.78K | |
| $43.35M | $44.61M | $68.76M |
DOGZ vs. WGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGZ Dogness (International) Corporation | -91.67% | -76.70% | 793.70% | -74.03% | -88.35% | 298.58% | -17.90% |
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -49.94% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOGZ and WGS is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
DOGZ:
$12.81M
WGS:
$1.93B
DOGZ:
-$0.74
WGS:
-$2.75
DOGZ:
0.43
WGS:
4.17
DOGZ:
0.17
WGS:
7.52
DOGZ:
$36.59M
WGS:
$442.68M
DOGZ:
$7.70M
WGS:
$302.56M
DOGZ:
-$6.31M
WGS:
-$51.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOGZ vs. WGS — Risk / Return Rank
DOGZ
WGS
DOGZ vs. WGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) and GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOGZ | WGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.46 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -0.81 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOGZ vs. WGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOGZ drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, roughly equal to the maximum WGS drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGZ and WGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOGZ | WGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.50% | -99.85% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.49% | -79.40% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.45% | -82.63% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -99.69% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.49% | -92.36% | -7.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.51% | -83.56% | +11.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.46% | 44.51% | +23.95% |
Volatility
DOGZ vs. WGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) is 14.94%, while GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a volatility of 20.98%. This indicates that DOGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOGZ | WGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.94% | 20.98% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.78% | 86.94% | -28.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 129.40% | 83.15% | +46.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.87% | 110.05% | +23.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.22% | 106.80% | +13.42% |
Dividends
DOGZ vs. WGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DOGZ nor WGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DOGZ vs. WGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dogness (International) Corporation and GeneDx Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DOGZ vs. WGS - Profitability Comparison
DOGZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dogness (International) Corporation reported a gross profit of 866.97K and revenue of 7.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.
WGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.21M and revenue of 102.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.
DOGZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dogness (International) Corporation reported an operating income of -4.34M and revenue of 7.71M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.3%.
WGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -57.47M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.2%.
DOGZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dogness (International) Corporation reported a net income of -5.18M and revenue of 7.71M, resulting in a net margin of -67.1%.
WGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -63.32M and revenue of 102.25M, resulting in a net margin of -61.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DOGZ and WGS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGS has higher volatility (20.98%) compared to DOGZ (14.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGZ dropped -99.50% vs WGS's -99.85%.
WGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOGZ and WGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer