DOG vs. SQQQ
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DOG returned -11.50%/yr vs -56.24%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DOG vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -11.50%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.24% annualized return.
DOG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -5.77%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- -14.33%
- 3Y*
- -8.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.91%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
DOG vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -5.77% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and SQQQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DOG and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DOG vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOG
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DOG
SQQQ
Basic Materials
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
DOG
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
SQQQ
DOG vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOG | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.78 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.02 | -0.96 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | -1.81 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOG vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.79%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.79% | -100.00% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.12% | -63.52% | +49.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -92.51% | +62.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.86% | -97.27% | +62.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.17% | -99.98% | +28.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.73% | -100.00% | +7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.45% | -92.73% | +26.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 36.37% | -27.68% |
Volatility
DOG vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 4.15%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.69%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 26.69% | -22.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 43.33% | -33.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 53.65% | -41.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 67.53% | -52.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 66.47% | -48.98% |
DOG vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DOG and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DOG vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than SQQQ's 11.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.55% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.69%) compared to DOG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.79% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, DOG leads with -11.50% vs -56.24% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DOG has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -56.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 3.55% for DOG.
DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.14 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer