DOG vs. BAMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and BAMO (Brookstone Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while BAMO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone. DOG is passively managed, while BAMO is actively managed. Over the past year, DOG returned -14.33% vs 12.98% for BAMO. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for BAMO.

Performance

DOG vs. BAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than BAMO's 5.22% return.

DOG

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: -5.77%
• 6M: -4.85%
• 1Y: -14.33%
• 3Y*: -8.97%
• 5Y*: -5.91%
• 10Y*: -11.50%

BAMO

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 4.73%
• 1Y: 12.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOG vs. BAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	-5.77%	-8.40%	-5.62%	-9.45%
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	5.22%	9.16%	14.39%	7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DOG and BAMO is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	-0.84

The correlation between DOG and BAMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DOG vs. BAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOG

DOG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 64
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOG vs. BAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DOG	BAMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.16	1.94	-3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.57	2.83	-4.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.37	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.02	2.39	-3.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.82	10.91	-12.73

DOG vs. BAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOG Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the BAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOG and BAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DOG vs. BAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.79%, which is greater than BAMO's maximum drawdown of -12.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and BAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOG	BAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.79%	-12.72%	-80.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.12%	-5.45%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.73%	-1.08%	-91.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.45%	-1.25%	-65.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.69%	1.19%	+7.50%

Volatility

DOG vs. BAMO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) at 2.60%. This indicates that DOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOG	BAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	2.60%	+1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	5.85%	+4.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.45%	6.73%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	9.58%	+5.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	9.58%	+7.91%

DOG vs. BAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMO's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DOG vs. BAMO - Dividend Comparison

DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than BAMO's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.47%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	3.55%	3.65%	5.72%	4.54%	0.41%	0.00%	0.14%	1.54%	0.86%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOG and BAMO in my portfolio?

DOG and BAMO have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOG or BAMO?

DOG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BAMO (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.79% vs BAMO's -12.72%.

Which ETF is better, DOG or BAMO?

On 1-year performance, BAMO leads with 12.98% vs -14.33% for DOG. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOG or BAMO?

Over the 1-year period, BAMO has performed better with a 12.98% return vs -14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOG or BAMO?

DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOG or BAMO?

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.47% for BAMO.

What is the main difference between DOG and BAMO?

DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BAMO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 1.30% for BAMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.