DNOV vs. JAJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) and JAJL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul) are both Defined Outcome funds. DNOV is passively managed, while JAJL is actively managed. Over the past year, DNOV returned 17.37% vs 7.79% for JAJL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JAJL.

Performance

DNOV vs. JAJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNOV achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly higher than JAJL's 2.52% return.

DNOV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 4.78%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: —

JAJL

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 2.86%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNOV vs. JAJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November	4.78%	13.93%	3.37%
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul	2.52%	6.56%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DNOV and JAJL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.69

The correlation between DNOV and JAJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

DNOV vs. JAJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DNOV	JAJL
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DNOV vs. JAJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOV

DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 89
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

JAJL

JAJL Risk / Return Rank: 95
JAJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
JAJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
JAJL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
JAJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
JAJL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOV vs. JAJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNOV	JAJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	3.38	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.61	5.67	-1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.83	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	7.76	-3.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.39	38.16	-15.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNOV vs. JAJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOV Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the JAJL Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOV and JAJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNOV	JAJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.05	3.38	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	2.69	-1.77

Drawdowns

DNOV vs. JAJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than JAJL's maximum drawdown of -2.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and JAJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNOV	JAJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-2.16%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.18%	-1.01%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.04%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-0.28%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.20%	+0.58%

Volatility

DNOV vs. JAJL - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) at 0.35%. This indicates that DNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNOV	JAJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	0.35%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.22%	1.39%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.73%	2.32%	+3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.61%	2.67%	+4.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.04%	2.67%	+6.37%

DNOV vs. JAJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JAJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DNOV vs. JAJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNOV nor JAJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNOV and JAJL in my portfolio?

DNOV and JAJL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DNOV or JAJL?

DNOV has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to JAJL (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOV dropped -15.03% vs JAJL's -2.16%.

Which ETF is better, DNOV or JAJL?

On 1-year performance, DNOV leads with 17.37% vs 7.79% for JAJL. On fees, JAJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, JAJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DNOV or JAJL?

Over the 1-year period, DNOV has performed better with a 17.37% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DNOV or JAJL?

JAJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DNOV or JAJL?

DNOV and JAJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DNOV and JAJL?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DNOV and 0.79% for JAJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.