PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNOV vs. DAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DNOV vs. DAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DNOV vs. DAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November
-1.91%13.93%10.71%18.52%-7.50%6.03%7.49%1.47%
DAUG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August
-1.78%11.75%12.00%13.85%-11.95%6.71%8.01%1.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNOV achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than DAUG's -1.78% return.


DNOV

1D
1.46%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
2.32%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*

DAUG

1D
1.57%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DNOV vs. DAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DNOV and DAUG have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

DNOV vs. DAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOV
DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DAUG
DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOV vs. DAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNOVDAUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

1.27

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

1.89

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.84

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.43

9.69

+2.74

DNOV vs. DAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the DAUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOV and DAUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNOVDAUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.27

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.65

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.63

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between DNOV and DAUG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DNOV vs. DAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNOV nor DAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DNOV vs. DAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, roughly equal to the maximum DAUG drawdown of -15.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and DAUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DNOVDAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-15.34%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-6.90%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

-15.34%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-2.87%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-2.89%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.31%

-0.14%

Volatility

DNOV vs. DAUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) is 2.68%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that DNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DNOVDAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.99%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

4.53%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

9.68%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

8.01%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

9.36%

-0.24%