PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNOV vs. DAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DNOV vs. DAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DNOV vs. DAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November
-1.91%13.93%10.71%18.52%-7.50%2.80%
DAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April
1.06%5.74%14.99%9.84%-6.84%5.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNOV achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than DAPR's 1.06% return.


DNOV

1D
1.46%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
2.32%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*

DAPR

1D
0.47%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.06%
6M
2.92%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DNOV vs. DAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DNOV and DAPR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

DNOV vs. DAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOV
DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DAPR
DAPR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOV vs. DAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNOVDAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

0.59

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

0.93

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.76

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.43

4.28

+8.15

DNOV vs. DAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the DAPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOV and DAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNOVDAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

0.59

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.71

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between DNOV and DAPR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DNOV vs. DAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNOV nor DAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DNOV vs. DAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than DAPR's maximum drawdown of -10.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and DAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DNOVDAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-10.51%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-9.57%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

0.00%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-2.38%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.71%

-0.54%

Volatility

DNOV vs. DAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April (DAPR) at 0.95%. This indicates that DNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DNOVDAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

0.95%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

1.78%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

11.61%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

8.27%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

8.27%

+0.85%