PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNL vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNL vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DNL having a 10.65% return and RODM slightly higher at 10.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DNL having a 9.82% annualized return and RODM not far behind at 9.81%.


DNL

1D
0.97%
1M
1.75%
YTD
10.65%
6M
10.38%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
9.82%

RODM

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
10.75%
6M
10.29%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.65%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%36.23%-14.76%31.11%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.75%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and RODM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.80

The correlation between DNL and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DNL vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DNL
RODM

Technology

35.1%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.3%
6.0%

Industrials

15.9%
16.7%

Healthcare

10.1%
9.0%

Communication Services

6.0%
5.5%

Energy

5.8%
6.3%

Financial Services

4.0%
26.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.0%

Utilities

0.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

3.5%

Technology

DNL
35.1%
RODM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DNL
18.3%
RODM
6.0%

Industrials

DNL
15.9%
RODM
16.7%

Healthcare

DNL
10.1%
RODM
9.0%

Communication Services

DNL
6.0%
RODM
5.5%

Energy

DNL
5.8%
RODM
6.3%

Financial Services

DNL
4.0%
RODM
26.6%

Basic Materials

DNL
3.2%
RODM
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

DNL
1.1%
RODM
4.0%

Utilities

DNL
0.5%
RODM
4.8%

Real Estate

DNL

-

RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNL vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.41

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.44

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

13.54

-8.62

DNL vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNL vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-35.98%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-7.10%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-10.58%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-28.85%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-35.98%

+1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-1.64%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-6.35%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.80%

+1.69%

Volatility

DNL vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.29%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

3.29%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.16%

8.78%

+7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

10.93%

+7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

13.45%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

15.07%

+3.53%

DNL vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNL vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than RODM's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.31%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.88%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNL and RODM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNL has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to RODM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, DNL leads with 9.82% vs 9.81% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DNL has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.31% for DNL.

DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNL and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer