DNL vs. RODM
DNL (WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DNL tracks the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index while RODM tracks the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DNL returned 9.82%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for RODM. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
DNL vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DNL having a 10.65% return and RODM slightly higher at 10.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DNL having a 9.82% annualized return and RODM not far behind at 9.81%.
DNL
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
RODM
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
DNL vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 10.65% | 17.03% | -0.61% | 17.00% | -22.38% | 16.14% | 18.22% | 36.23% | -14.76% | 31.11% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 10.75% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNL and RODM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DNL and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DNL vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DNL
RODM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DNL
RODM
Consumer Cyclical
DNL
RODM
Industrials
DNL
RODM
Healthcare
DNL
RODM
Communication Services
DNL
RODM
Energy
DNL
RODM
Financial Services
DNL
RODM
Basic Materials
DNL
RODM
Consumer Defensive
DNL
RODM
Utilities
DNL
RODM
Real Estate
DNL
-
RODM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNL vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
DNL
RODM
DNL vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DNL | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.41 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.44 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 13.54 | -8.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DNL vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNL | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -35.98% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -7.10% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.15% | -10.58% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -28.85% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.85% | -35.98% | +1.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -1.64% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -6.35% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 1.80% | +1.69% |
Volatility
DNL vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.29%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNL | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 3.29% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.16% | 8.78% | +7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 10.93% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 13.45% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 15.07% | +3.53% |
DNL vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNL vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than RODM's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.31% | 2.06% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 4.82% | 1.38% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 1.86% | 2.51% | 1.98% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.88% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNL and RODM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNL has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to RODM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 10-year performance, DNL leads with 9.82% vs 9.81% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DNL has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.31% for DNL.
DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.29% for RODM.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNL and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer