PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMXF vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMXF vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.


DMXF

1D
-2.70%
1M
1.22%
YTD
11.78%
6M
10.88%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
11.78%22.07%3.99%20.52%-19.25%10.90%22.80%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%50.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and SLV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMXF vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMXFSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.47

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

3.16

+3.15

DMXF vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMXFSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-76.28%

+41.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-47.23%

+35.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-47.23%

+30.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-47.23%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-47.23%

+44.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-44.65%

+37.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

21.91%

-18.74%

Volatility

DMXF vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 6.29%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMXFSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

14.34%

-8.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

59.27%

-44.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

60.33%

-43.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

36.59%

-18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

32.09%

-14.75%

DMXF vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMXF vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.26%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMXF and SLV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to DMXF (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 18.31% vs 6.99% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 18.31% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

DMXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SLV is Silver. DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.50% for SLV.

DMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMXF and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer