DMXF vs. DFSI
DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) and DFSI (Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DMXF is passively managed, while DFSI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DMXF returned 14.81%/yr vs 16.80%/yr for DFSI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMXF charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DFSI.
Performance
DMXF vs. DFSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than DFSI's 5.54% return.
DMXF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
DFSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF vs. DFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.52% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | 13.04% |
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 5.54% | 33.62% | 4.98% | 17.86% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMXF and DFSI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DMXF and DFSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMXF vs. DFSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMXF
DFSI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
DMXF
DFSI
Technology
DMXF
DFSI
Industrials
DMXF
DFSI
Healthcare
DMXF
DFSI
Communication Services
DMXF
DFSI
Basic Materials
DMXF
DFSI
Consumer Cyclical
DMXF
DFSI
Real Estate
DMXF
DFSI
Consumer Defensive
DMXF
DFSI
Utilities
DMXF
DFSI
Energy
DMXF
-
DFSI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMXF vs. DFSI — Risk / Return Rank
DMXF
DFSI
DMXF vs. DFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMXF | DFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.88 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.57 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 5.94 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMXF | DFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.36 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
DMXF vs. DFSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than DFSI's maximum drawdown of -12.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and DFSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMXF | DFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -12.82% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -12.26% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -12.82% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -3.15% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -2.62% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 3.22% | -0.07% |
Volatility
DMXF vs. DFSI - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) at 4.63%. This indicates that DMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMXF | DFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.63% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 12.67% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 14.97% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 15.24% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 15.24% | +2.01% |
DMXF vs. DFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSI's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DMXF vs. DFSI - Dividend Comparison
DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than DFSI's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 2.14% | 2.23% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.35% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DMXF and DFSI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DMXF has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to DFSI (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs DFSI's -12.82%.
On 3-year performance, DFSI leads with 16.80% vs 14.81% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSI has performed better with a 16.80% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSI.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.14% for DFSI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.24% for DFSI.
DFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMXF and DFSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer