DMSFX vs. RMDFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX).
DMSFX is managed by Destinations Funds. It was launched on Mar 19, 2017. RMDFX is managed by Aspiriant. It was launched on Dec 13, 2015.
Performance
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | -1.62% | 3.65% | 6.40% | 12.82% | -3.45% | 5.22% | 10.01% | 8.93% | -4.99% | 2.93% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 2.53% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 8.01% | -6.84% | 4.20% | 5.10% | 11.50% | -4.89% | 6.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMSFX achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than RMDFX's 2.53% return.
DMSFX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- —
RMDFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMSFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DMSFX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank
DMSFX
RMDFX
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMSFX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 3.47 | -2.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 4.74 | -3.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.75 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 4.07 | -3.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 17.19 | -14.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMSFX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 3.47 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.83 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.78 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between DMSFX and RMDFX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison
DMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than RMDFX's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 3.81% | 3.42% | 6.41% | 6.62% | 3.05% | 4.68% | 1.48% | 4.64% | 4.31% | 2.00% | 0.00% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.52% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMSFX drawdown since its inception was -21.11%, which is greater than RMDFX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMSFX and RMDFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMSFX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.11% | -15.96% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | -4.19% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.84% | -14.63% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -3.79% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -3.37% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.99% | -0.02% |
Volatility
DMSFX vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) is 0.67%, while Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that DMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DMSFX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 1.99% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 3.83% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 5.01% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 6.34% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 6.20% | -1.13% |