DMSFX vs. DCFFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DMSFX (Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund) and DCFFX (Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - DMSFX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Destinations Funds, while DCFFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Destinations Funds. Over the past 5 years, DMSFX returned 4.04%/yr vs -0.55%/yr for DCFFX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DMSFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DCFFX.

Performance

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund (DCFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMSFX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than DCFFX's 0.39% return.

DMSFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 3.59%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: —

DCFFX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: 0.47%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 3.56%
• 5Y*: -0.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund	0.33%	3.65%	6.40%	12.82%	-3.45%	5.22%	10.01%	8.93%	-4.99%	2.93%
DCFFX Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund	0.39%	5.65%	2.28%	5.11%	-14.66%	-1.43%	4.71%	6.94%	0.03%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DMSFX and DCFFX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017	0.04

Over the past year, DMSFX and DCFFX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

DMSFX vs. DCFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMSFX

DMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 26
DMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
DMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
DMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
DMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

DCFFX

DCFFX Risk / Return Rank: 19
DCFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DCFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
DCFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
DCFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DCFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund (DCFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMSFX	DCFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.17	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.72	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	1.52	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	4.29	+0.39

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the DCFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMSFX and DCFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMSFX drawdown since its inception was -21.11%, which is greater than DCFFX's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMSFX and DCFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMSFX	DCFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.11%	-19.20%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-2.84%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.02%	-6.57%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.84%	-19.20%	+12.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-4.08%	+3.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-5.35%	+3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.99%	-0.17%

Volatility

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) is 0.55%, while Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund (DCFFX) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that DMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMSFX	DCFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	1.01%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.60%	2.70%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77%	3.70%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.68%	5.88%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.02%	4.75%	+0.27%

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMSFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DCFFX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMSFX vs. DCFFX - Dividend Comparison

DMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than DCFFX's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DCFFX Destinations Core Fixed Income Fund	3.92%	2.99%	3.96%	2.78%	1.73%	3.78%	2.54%	2.87%	2.66%	1.76%
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund	3.74%	3.42%	6.41%	6.62%	3.05%	4.68%	1.48%	4.64%	4.31%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMSFX and DCFFX in my portfolio?

DMSFX and DCFFX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMSFX or DCFFX?

DCFFX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to DMSFX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMSFX dropped -21.11% vs DCFFX's -19.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.