RMDFX vs. FSHNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX).
RMDFX is managed by Aspiriant. It was launched on Dec 13, 2015. FSHNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 10, 2011.
Performance
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 2.53% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 8.01% | -6.84% | 4.20% | 5.10% | 11.50% | -4.89% | 9.41% |
FSHNX Fidelity Series High Income Fund | -0.85% | 11.17% | 8.75% | 11.25% | -11.52% | 6.05% | 4.57% | 15.20% | -2.14% | 9.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMDFX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than FSHNX's -0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RMDFX has underperformed FSHNX with an annualized return of 4.91%, while FSHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.22% annualized return.
RMDFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
FSHNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMDFX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHNX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
RMDFX vs. FSHNX — Risk / Return Rank
RMDFX
FSHNX
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMDFX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.47 | 2.40 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.74 | 3.54 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.59 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 2.82 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 13.13 | +4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMDFX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 2.40 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 1.07 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.96 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMDFX and FSHNX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Dividend Comparison
RMDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than FSHNX's 6.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.52% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
FSHNX Fidelity Series High Income Fund | 6.57% | 7.04% | 5.97% | 6.21% | 4.90% | 5.01% | 5.57% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 6.03% | 6.24% | 5.79% |
Drawdowns
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMDFX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum FSHNX drawdown of -21.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMDFX and FSHNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMDFX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -21.98% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.19% | -3.26% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.63% | -15.32% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.96% | -21.98% | +6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.79% | -2.13% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -2.44% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.70% | +0.29% |
Volatility
RMDFX vs. FSHNX - Volatility Comparison
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX) at 1.23%. This indicates that RMDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMDFX | FSHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 1.23% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 2.26% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.01% | 4.02% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 5.27% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.20% | 5.83% | +0.37% |