PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMDFX vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RMDFX vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RMDFX vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RMDFX
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
2.53%18.85%1.45%5.98%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
-0.78%7.57%5.76%7.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMDFX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's -0.78% return.


RMDFX

1D
0.25%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
2.53%
6M
7.56%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
4.91%

BINC

1D
0.33%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
0.65%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RMDFX vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMDFX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RMDFX vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMDFX
RMDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RMDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RMDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMDFX vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMDFXBINCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.47

1.74

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.74

2.29

+2.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.38

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

1.91

+2.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.19

7.93

+9.26

RMDFX vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMDFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMDFX and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMDFXBINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

1.74

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

2.28

-1.51

Correlation

The correlation between RMDFX and BINC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RMDFX vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

RMDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than BINC's 5.91% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RMDFX
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
4.52%4.63%0.00%3.69%0.78%5.37%2.28%3.78%4.11%2.16%1.16%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.91%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RMDFX vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMDFX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMDFX and BINC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RMDFXBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-2.69%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.19%

-2.69%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.79%

-2.14%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-0.33%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.65%

+0.34%

Volatility

RMDFX vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.25%. This indicates that RMDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RMDFXBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.25%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

1.69%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

2.94%

+2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

3.03%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.20%

3.03%

+3.17%