DMSFX vs. DGFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX).
DMSFX is managed by Destinations Funds. It was launched on Mar 19, 2017. DGFFX is managed by Destinations Funds. It was launched on Mar 19, 2017.
Performance
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | -1.62% | 3.65% | 6.40% | 12.82% | -3.45% | 5.22% | 10.01% | 8.93% | -4.99% | 2.93% |
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund | 0.46% | 5.84% | 8.04% | 7.82% | -6.09% | 4.91% | 3.59% | 6.64% | -0.35% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMSFX achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 0.46% return.
DMSFX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- —
DGFFX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMSFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DMSFX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank
DMSFX
DGFFX
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMSFX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.89 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 2.28 | -1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.55 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.67 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 7.34 | -4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMSFX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.89 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.52 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.47 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between DMSFX and DGFFX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison
DMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than DGFFX's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund | 3.81% | 3.42% | 6.41% | 6.62% | 3.05% | 4.68% | 1.48% | 4.64% | 4.31% | 2.00% |
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund | 6.21% | 5.52% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 3.37% | 4.14% | 4.22% | 4.18% | 3.79% | 2.94% |
Drawdowns
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMSFX drawdown since its inception was -21.11%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMSFX and DGFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMSFX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.11% | -12.69% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | -2.35% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.84% | -8.17% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -1.19% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -1.34% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.77% | +0.20% |
Volatility
DMSFX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) is 0.67%, while Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that DMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DMSFX | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.75% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 1.42% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 3.31% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 2.38% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 2.60% | +2.47% |