PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMSFX vs. DGEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Destinations Equity Income Fund (DGEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMSFX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than DGEFX's 12.45% return.


DMSFX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.10%
6M
1.02%
YTD
0.92%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.39%

DGEFX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.01%
6M
7.06%
YTD
12.45%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMSFX
Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund
0.92%3.65%6.40%12.82%-3.45%5.22%10.01%8.93%-4.99%2.93%
DGEFX
Destinations Equity Income Fund
12.45%18.95%13.27%5.11%-1.12%22.41%-4.09%21.80%-5.48%8.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DMSFX and DGEFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.56

The correlation between DMSFX and DGEFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMSFX vs. DGEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DMSFX
DMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DGEFX
DGEFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DGEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DGEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and Destinations Equity Income Fund (DGEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMSFXDGEFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.15

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.60

11.76

-6.16

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the DGEFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMSFX and DGEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMSFX drawdown since its inception was -21.11%, smaller than the maximum DGEFX drawdown of -36.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMSFX and DGEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMSFXDGEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.11%

-36.34%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-6.89%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-11.72%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

-17.18%

+10.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.39%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-3.97%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.84%

-1.04%

Volatility

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) is 0.67%, while Destinations Equity Income Fund (DGEFX) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that DMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMSFXDGEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

2.76%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

7.48%

-5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

9.52%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

12.51%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

14.49%

-9.50%

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMSFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DGEFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMSFX vs. DGEFX - Dividend Comparison

DMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than DGEFX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGEFX
Destinations Equity Income Fund
8.06%8.57%2.70%3.91%4.69%2.87%4.43%3.76%7.05%2.79%
DMSFX
Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund
4.63%3.42%6.41%6.62%3.05%4.68%1.48%4.64%4.31%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMSFX and DGEFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGEFX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to DMSFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMSFX dropped -21.11% vs DGEFX's -36.34%.

DGEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMSFX and DGEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer