DMDV vs. IPOS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS).

DMDV and IPOS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DMDV is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 27, 2018. IPOS is a passively managed fund by Renaissance Capital that tracks the performance of the Renaissance International IPO Index. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. Both DMDV and IPOS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DMDV vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DMDV vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DMDV AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	7.82%	18.63%	-7.53%	10.16%	-20.45%	30.25%	-8.11%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	11.50%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-30.62%	50.71%	30.93%	-5.77%

Returns By Period

DMDV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPOS

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -9.87%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 48.78%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: -11.43%
• 10Y*: 0.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMDV vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMDV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.

IPOS

Renaissance International IPO ETF

DMDV

AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF

Return for Risk

DMDV vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 81
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMDV vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMDV	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.01	—

Correlation

The correlation between DMDV and IPOS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DMDV vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMDV AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	3.51%	6.98%	5.60%	4.45%	3.13%	5.36%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.85%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DMDV	IPOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-73.09%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-70.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-52.62%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.78%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DMDV	IPOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	29.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	26.52%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.70%	—