PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMDV vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMDV vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DMDV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VT

1D
0.47%
1M
5.22%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.61%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMDV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%7.82%18.63%-7.53%10.16%-20.45%30.25%-8.11%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
13.23%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DMDV and VT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018

0.71

The correlation between DMDV and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DMDV vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMDV
VT

Industrials

12.5%
12.0%

Real Estate

10.0%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
4.8%

Utilities

9.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

9.0%
15.9%

Basic Materials

9.0%
4.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
9.5%

Technology

7.6%
27.8%

Energy

6.6%
4.3%

Industrials

DMDV
12.5%
VT
12.0%

Real Estate

DMDV
10.0%
VT
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

DMDV
9.4%
VT
4.8%

Utilities

DMDV
9.2%
VT
2.7%

Communication Services

DMDV
9.1%
VT
8.3%

Financial Services

DMDV
9.0%
VT
15.9%

Basic Materials

DMDV
9.0%
VT
4.2%

Healthcare

DMDV
8.9%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DMDV
8.7%
VT
9.5%

Technology

DMDV
7.6%
VT
27.8%

Energy

DMDV
6.6%
VT
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMDV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMDV

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMDV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DMDV vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMDVVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Drawdowns

DMDV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMDVVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

Volatility

DMDV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMDVVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

DMDV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMDV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMDV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%3.51%6.98%5.60%4.45%3.13%5.36%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.58%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMDV and VT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DMDV.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for DMDV.

DMDV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VT is Global Equities. DMDV tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DMDV and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMDV and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer