DMDV vs. IDHQ
DMDV (AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DMDV tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield while IDHQ tracks the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DMDV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DMDV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDHQ
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- YTD
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMDV AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.82% | 18.63% | -7.53% | 10.16% | -20.45% | 30.25% | -8.11% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 23.96% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | -20.23% | 11.38% | 16.09% | 29.58% | -3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMDV and IDHQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between DMDV and IDHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMDV vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
DMDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDHQ
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DMDV | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMDV | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -73.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.57% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.09% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMDV | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.85% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.97% | — |
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMDV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMDV vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMDV AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 6.98% | 5.60% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 5.36% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.04% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMDV and IDHQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DMDV.
IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for DMDV.
DMDV tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DMDV and 0.29% for IDHQ.
Find the right allocation for DMDV and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer