PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMDV vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMDV vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DMDV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
12.96%
6M
17.29%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMDV vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%7.82%18.63%-7.53%10.16%-20.45%30.25%-8.11%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
12.96%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DMDV and EFAS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018

0.73

The correlation between DMDV and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DMDV vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMDV
EFAS

Industrials

12.5%
9.9%

Real Estate

10.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
8.1%

Utilities

9.2%
14.4%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.6%

Financial Services

9.0%
30.1%

Basic Materials

9.0%
1.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
1.9%

Technology

7.6%
0.1%

Energy

6.6%
13.7%

Industrials

DMDV
12.5%
EFAS
9.9%

Real Estate

DMDV
10.0%
EFAS
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

DMDV
9.4%
EFAS
8.1%

Utilities

DMDV
9.2%
EFAS
14.4%

Communication Services

DMDV
9.1%
EFAS
8.6%

Financial Services

DMDV
9.0%
EFAS
30.1%

Basic Materials

DMDV
9.0%
EFAS
1.8%

Healthcare

DMDV
8.9%
EFAS
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DMDV
8.7%
EFAS
1.9%

Technology

DMDV
7.6%
EFAS
0.1%

Energy

DMDV
6.6%
EFAS
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMDV vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMDV

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMDV vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DMDV vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMDVEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

Drawdowns

DMDV vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMDVEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

Volatility

DMDV vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMDVEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

DMDV vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMDV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMDV vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%3.51%6.98%5.60%4.45%3.13%5.36%0.27%0.00%0.00%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
5.05%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMDV and EFAS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DMDV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DMDV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.00% for DMDV.

DMDV tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DMDV and 0.56% for EFAS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMDV and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer