PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMDV vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMDV vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DMDV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMDV vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%7.82%18.63%-7.53%10.16%-20.45%30.25%-8.11%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DMDV and DBAW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018

0.70

The correlation between DMDV and DBAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DMDV vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMDV
DBAW

Industrials

12.5%
15.0%

Real Estate

10.0%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
5.3%

Utilities

9.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

9.1%
5.0%

Financial Services

9.0%
24.1%

Basic Materials

9.0%
6.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.9%

Technology

7.6%
18.7%

Energy

6.6%
5.3%

Industrials

DMDV
12.5%
DBAW
15.0%

Real Estate

DMDV
10.0%
DBAW
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

DMDV
9.4%
DBAW
5.3%

Utilities

DMDV
9.2%
DBAW
3.2%

Communication Services

DMDV
9.1%
DBAW
5.0%

Financial Services

DMDV
9.0%
DBAW
24.1%

Basic Materials

DMDV
9.0%
DBAW
6.8%

Healthcare

DMDV
8.9%
DBAW
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DMDV
8.7%
DBAW
7.9%

Technology

DMDV
7.6%
DBAW
18.7%

Energy

DMDV
6.6%
DBAW
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMDV vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMDV

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMDV vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF (DMDV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DMDV vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMDVDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

DMDV vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMDVDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

DMDV vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMDVDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

DMDV vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMDV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMDV vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

DMDV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
DMDV
AAM S&P Developed Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%3.51%6.98%5.60%4.45%3.13%5.36%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMDV and DBAW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DMDV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DMDV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for DMDV.

DMDV tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DMDV and 0.41% for DBAW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMDV and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer