PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAY vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.


DMAY

1D
0.08%
1M
1.59%
YTD
4.73%
6M
5.76%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
4.73%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%6.40%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%46.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAY and CIBR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.66

The correlation between DMAY and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DMAY vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMAY
CIBR

Technology

36.2%
94.0%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

DMAY
36.2%
CIBR
94.0%

Financial Services

DMAY
11.9%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

DMAY
10.9%
CIBR
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DMAY
10.1%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

DMAY
8.4%
CIBR

-

Industrials

DMAY
8.1%
CIBR
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

DMAY
4.9%
CIBR

-

Energy

DMAY
3.5%
CIBR

-

Utilities

DMAY
2.3%
CIBR

-

Real Estate

DMAY
1.9%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

DMAY
1.8%
CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMAYCIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

1.06

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.20

1.56

+2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.20

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

1.18

+2.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.92

2.79

+22.13

DMAY vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAY and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMAYCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

1.06

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.66

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.67

+0.22

Drawdowns

DMAY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAYCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-33.89%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-21.99%

+18.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

-21.99%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

-33.89%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.81%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-8.66%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

9.25%

-8.70%

Volatility

DMAY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.76%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAYCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

10.90%

-10.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.73%

20.90%

-17.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

24.50%

-19.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

24.95%

-15.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

23.60%

-15.17%

DMAY vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to DMAY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.28% vs 7.26% for DMAY. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

DMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.60% for CIBR.

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAY and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer