DLB vs. HAL
DLB (Dolby Laboratories, Inc.) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. DLB operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, DLB returned 2.40%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for HAL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DLB vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLB achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, DLB has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 2.40%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.
DLB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -17.26%
- 6M
- -21.32%
- 1Y
- -28.66%
- 3Y*
- -13.16%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
DLB vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc. | -17.26% | -16.27% | -7.95% | 23.82% | -24.90% | -0.99% | 42.99% | 12.63% | 0.78% | 38.73% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLB and HAL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2005 | 0.30 |
The correlation between DLB and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DLB:
$5.02B
HAL:
$33.22B
DLB:
$2.53
HAL:
$1.82
DLB:
20.79
HAL:
21.80
DLB:
30.68
HAL:
3.48
DLB:
3.71
HAL:
1.51
DLB:
1.92
HAL:
3.07
DLB:
$1.36B
HAL:
$22.17B
DLB:
$1.19B
HAL:
$3.40B
DLB:
$347.35M
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLB vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
DLB
HAL
DLB vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLB | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.36 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 6.47 | -7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.93 | 16.47 | -18.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLB vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLB drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLB and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLB | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.19% | -92.99% | +30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.11% | -13.10% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.92% | -54.01% | +15.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.41% | -54.01% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.04% | -91.45% | +46.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.04% | -32.89% | -12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.37% | -39.12% | +16.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.84% | 5.14% | +9.70% |
Volatility
DLB vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) is 6.02%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that DLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLB | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 9.32% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.37% | 24.13% | -3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.14% | 36.76% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 40.18% | -15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 45.96% | -19.35% |
Dividends
DLB vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
DLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than HAL's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc. | 2.68% | 2.10% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.45% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 1.25% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
DLB vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DLB vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
DLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a gross profit of 350.90M and revenue of 395.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.7%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
DLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.95M and revenue of 395.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
DLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a net income of 94.92M and revenue of 395.63M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DLB and HAL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to DLB (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLB dropped -62.19% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLB and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer