PortfoliosLab logo
DLB vs. GLW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DLB and GLW is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DLB vs. GLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DLB:

-0.09

GLW:

1.14

Sortino Ratio

DLB:

-0.02

GLW:

1.83

Omega Ratio

DLB:

1.00

GLW:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

DLB:

-0.13

GLW:

0.80

Martin Ratio

DLB:

-0.51

GLW:

4.41

Ulcer Index

DLB:

8.58%

GLW:

9.76%

Daily Std Dev

DLB:

28.87%

GLW:

34.34%

Max Drawdown

DLB:

-62.19%

GLW:

-99.02%

Current Drawdown

DLB:

-23.20%

GLW:

-33.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DLB:

$7.26B

GLW:

$42.76B

EPS

DLB:

$2.64

GLW:

$0.51

PE Ratio

DLB:

28.27

GLW:

96.96

PEG Ratio

DLB:

2.08

GLW:

0.49

PS Ratio

DLB:

5.50

GLW:

3.14

PB Ratio

DLB:

2.79

GLW:

3.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLB:

$1.32B

GLW:

$13.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLB:

$1.17B

GLW:

$4.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

DLB:

$121.80M

GLW:

$2.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLB achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DLB has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 8.03%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.


DLB

YTD

-3.18%

1M

-1.41%

6M

-2.91%

1Y

-2.54%

3Y*

0.03%

5Y*

5.71%

10Y*

8.03%

GLW

YTD

5.74%

1M

12.37%

6M

4.20%

1Y

44.24%

3Y*

14.98%

5Y*

20.26%

10Y*

12.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Corning Incorporated

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DLB vs. GLW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DLB is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DLB is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DLB is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DLB is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DLB is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DLB is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GLW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLW is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLW is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLW is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLW is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLW is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLW is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DLB vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DLB Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the GLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLB and GLW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DLB vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison

DLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than GLW's 2.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
1.72%1.57%1.29%1.45%0.96%0.91%1.15%1.08%0.94%1.11%1.25%0.23%
GLW
Corning Incorporated
2.80%2.36%3.68%3.38%2.58%2.44%2.75%2.38%1.94%2.22%2.63%1.74%

Drawdowns

DLB vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLB drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLB and GLW.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DLB vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) is 5.41%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that DLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DLB vs. GLW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
369.56M
3.45B
(DLB) Total Revenue
(GLW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DLB vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and Corning Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
90.3%
35.2%
(DLB) Gross Margin
(GLW) Gross Margin
DLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a gross profit of 333.72M and revenue of 369.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.3%.

GLW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 3.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.

DLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported an operating income of 111.97M and revenue of 369.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

GLW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 3.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

DLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a net income of 91.79M and revenue of 369.56M, resulting in a net margin of 24.8%.

GLW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 157.00M and revenue of 3.45B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.