PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJTU vs. NVDQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -70.74% return, which is significantly lower than NVDQ's -36.85% return.


DJTU

1D
0.00%
1M
13.86%
6M
-75.00%
YTD
-70.74%
1Y
-89.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDQ

1D
-7.98%
1M
-7.90%
6M
-37.88%
YTD
-36.85%
1Y
-57.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DJTU
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF
-70.74%-82.18%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
-36.85%-76.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DJTU and NVDQ is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJTU vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJTU
DJTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DJTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DJTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJTUNVDQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.87

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-0.91

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.60

+0.30

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is comparable to the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJTU and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and NVDQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJTUNVDQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.02%

-99.45%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.76%

-63.49%

-30.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.75%

-99.36%

+3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.31%

-88.48%

+19.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.45%

35.97%

+33.48%

Volatility

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) has a higher volatility of 43.74% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 21.80%. This indicates that DJTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJTUNVDQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.74%

21.80%

+21.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

86.12%

54.88%

+31.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.41%

70.54%

+66.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.86%

94.96%

+45.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.86%

94.96%

+45.90%

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJTU and NVDQ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

DJTU vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

DJTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DJTU
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.41%0.26%4.59%11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJTU and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJTU has higher volatility (43.74%) compared to NVDQ (21.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJTU dropped -97.02% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

On 1-year performance, NVDQ leads with -57.10% vs -89.88% for DJTU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 21.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDQ has performed better with a -57.10% return vs -89.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJTU and NVDQ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for DJTU.

DJTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities.

DJTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJTU and NVDQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer