PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJTU vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -61.30% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 30.29% return.


DJTU

1D
3.44%
1M
30.00%
6M
-53.20%
YTD
-61.30%
1Y
-83.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-84.88%

BTCZ

1D
-3.09%
1M
-9.19%
6M
9.48%
YTD
30.29%
1Y
80.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-52.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.14M$108.52M$120.21M
$610.98K$678.60K$1.03M

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJTU and BTCZ is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJTU vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DJTU
DJTU Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DJTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJTU Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DJTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJTUBTCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.20

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

1.65

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

3.58

-4.79

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJTU and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -97.02%, which is greater than BTCZ's maximum drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJTUBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.02%

-91.06%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.49%

-49.02%

-43.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.39%

-78.99%

-15.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-73.92%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.69%

22.59%

+46.10%

Volatility

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) has a higher volatility of 39.62% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) at 17.81%. This indicates that DJTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJTUBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.62%

17.81%

+21.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.84%

67.28%

+23.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.93%

89.11%

+51.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.17%

95.58%

+45.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.17%

95.58%

+45.59%

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJTU vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

DJTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
DJTU
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJTU and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJTU has higher volatility (39.62%) compared to BTCZ (17.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJTU dropped -97.02% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 80.46% vs -83.38% for DJTU. On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 17.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 80.46% return vs -83.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for DJTU.

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for DJTU.

DJTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BTCZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for DJTU and 0.95% for BTCZ.

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJTU and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer