DJP vs. LQDW
DJP (iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN) and LQDW (iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DJP is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index, while LQDW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DJP returned 17.42%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for LQDW. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DJP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for LQDW.
Performance
DJP vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 29.06% return, which is significantly higher than LQDW's 1.45% return.
DJP
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 29.06%
- 6M
- 27.44%
- 1Y
- 42.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
LQDW
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJP vs. LQDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 29.06% | 17.20% | 5.59% | -9.85% | -8.79% |
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 1.45% | 9.05% | 2.60% | 3.99% | -6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJP and LQDW is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between DJP and LQDW shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJP vs. LQDW — Risk / Return Rank
DJP
LQDW
DJP vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJP | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.97 | 2.62 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.64 | 9.79 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJP | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 1.92 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.47 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
DJP vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and LQDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJP | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.35% | -9.20% | -69.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -2.59% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -6.74% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.63% | -0.15% | -33.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.86% | -2.35% | -48.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 0.69% | +2.69% |
Volatility
DJP vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) at 1.39%. This indicates that DJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJP | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 1.39% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.68% | 3.02% | +13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 3.54% | +15.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 5.49% | +13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 5.49% | +11.58% |
DJP vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJP vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison
DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 12.55% | 16.02% | 15.74% | 19.28% | 8.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJP and LQDW have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DJP has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to LQDW (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJP dropped -78.35% vs LQDW's -9.20%.
On 3-year performance, DJP leads with 17.42% vs 3.87% for LQDW. On fees, LQDW is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, LQDW has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DJP has performed better with a 17.42% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQDW is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DJP.
LQDW has the higher dividend yield at 12.55%, compared with 0.00% for DJP.
DJP is categorized as Commodities, while LQDW is Corporate Bonds. DJP tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index, while LQDW tracks CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DJP and 0.34% for LQDW.
DJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJP and LQDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer