PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDW vs. LQDH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDW and LQDH is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

LQDW vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.64%
4.82%
LQDW
LQDH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDW:

0.81

LQDH:

2.77

Sortino Ratio

LQDW:

1.12

LQDH:

4.06

Omega Ratio

LQDW:

1.16

LQDH:

1.58

Calmar Ratio

LQDW:

0.72

LQDH:

4.01

Martin Ratio

LQDW:

2.37

LQDH:

20.59

Ulcer Index

LQDW:

1.58%

LQDH:

0.35%

Daily Std Dev

LQDW:

4.61%

LQDH:

2.63%

Max Drawdown

LQDW:

-9.20%

LQDH:

-24.63%

Current Drawdown

LQDW:

-1.56%

LQDH:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDW achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than LQDH's 0.96% return.


LQDW

YTD

1.29%

1M

1.29%

6M

0.65%

1Y

3.40%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LQDH

YTD

0.96%

1M

0.96%

6M

4.83%

1Y

7.50%

5Y*

4.43%

10Y*

3.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDW vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio.


LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for LQDW: current value at 0.34% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.34%
Expense ratio chart for LQDH: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDW vs. LQDH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDW is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDW is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDH is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDW vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.812.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.124.06
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.58
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.724.01
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.3720.59
LQDW
LQDH

The current LQDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the LQDH Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDW and LQDH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.81
2.77
LQDW
LQDH

Dividends

LQDW vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

LQDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.54%, more than LQDH's 7.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
15.54%15.74%19.28%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
7.50%7.57%7.69%3.73%1.64%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%2.19%

Drawdowns

LQDW vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDW drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDW and LQDH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.56%
0
LQDW
LQDH

Volatility

LQDW vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.50%. This indicates that LQDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.41%
0.50%
LQDW
LQDH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab