LQDW vs. LQD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).
LQDW and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQDW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Aug 18, 2022. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both LQDW and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LQDW or LQD.
Key characteristics
| LQDW | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.93% | 1.86% |
| 1Y Return | 4.64% | 11.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.04 | 1.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.42 | 2.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.88 | 0.58 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.14 | 5.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.13% | 2.13% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.48% | 7.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.20% | -24.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.51% | -10.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDW and LQD is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LQDW vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LQDW achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 1.86% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQDW vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LQDW vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LQDW vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
LQDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.44%, more than LQD's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 16.44% | 19.28% | 8.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.39% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% | 3.83% |
Drawdowns
LQDW vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDW drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDW and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LQDW vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) is 2.29%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that LQDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.