PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJAN vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJAN vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJAN achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 15.40% return.


DJAN

1D
0.11%
1M
0.99%
6M
4.77%
YTD
5.29%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*

NVII

1D
0.20%
1M
1.09%
6M
16.94%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
32.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJAN vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJAN and NVII is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.57

The correlation between DJAN and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJAN vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJAN
DJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJAN vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJANNVIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.17

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.75

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

3.82

+10.65

DJAN vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJAN and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJAN vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum NVII drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJANNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-18.56%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-18.56%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-8.62%

+8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-6.22%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

8.49%

-7.61%

Volatility

DJAN vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is 1.87%, while REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that DJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJANNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

10.97%

-9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

27.86%

-23.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

36.38%

-30.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

35.53%

-28.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.91%

35.53%

-28.62%

DJAN vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJAN vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

DJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.67%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DJAN and NVII have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to DJAN (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs NVII's -18.56%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 32.35% vs 12.65% for DJAN. On fees, DJAN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 32.35% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJAN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 54.67%, compared with 0.00% for DJAN.

DJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJAN and 0.99% for NVII.

DJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAN and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer