PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJAN vs. JANP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJAN vs. JANP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJAN achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than JANP's 6.30% return.


DJAN

1D
0.08%
1M
1.95%
YTD
5.05%
6M
6.34%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*

JANP

1D
0.05%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.30%
6M
7.57%
1Y
18.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJAN vs. JANP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJAN and JANP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024

0.92

The correlation between DJAN and JANP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJAN vs. JANP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJAN
DJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

JANP
JANP Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JANP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JANP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJAN vs. JANP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJANJANPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.89

2.74

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.24

3.93

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.57

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.51

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.47

18.34

+1.13

DJAN vs. JANP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the JANP Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJAN and JANP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJANJANPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.74

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.64

-0.48

Drawdowns

DJAN vs. JANP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum JANP drawdown of -12.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and JANP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJANJANPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-12.18%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-5.32%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-0.90%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.02%

-0.17%

Volatility

DJAN vs. JANP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is 1.03%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that DJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJANJANPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.41%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

5.52%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

6.77%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.02%

9.07%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

9.07%

-2.15%

DJAN vs. JANP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JANP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJAN vs. JANP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJAN nor JANP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DJAN and JANP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JANP has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to DJAN (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs JANP's -12.18%.

On 1-year performance, JANP leads with 18.44% vs 16.14% for DJAN. On fees, JANP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JANP has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 16.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JANP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJAN.

DJAN and JANP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJAN and 0.50% for JANP.

DJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAN and JANP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer