DJAN vs. JANP
DJAN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January) and JANP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DJAN returned 16.14% vs 18.44% for JANP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DJAN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for JANP.
Performance
DJAN vs. JANP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJAN achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than JANP's 6.30% return.
DJAN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
JANP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 18.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJAN vs. JANP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DJAN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January | 5.05% | 11.09% | 13.08% |
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January | 6.30% | 13.33% | 15.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJAN and JANP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DJAN and JANP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJAN vs. JANP — Risk / Return Rank
DJAN
JANP
DJAN vs. JANP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJAN | JANP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.89 | 2.74 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.24 | 3.93 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.57 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 3.51 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.47 | 18.34 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJAN | JANP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.74 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 1.64 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
DJAN vs. JANP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum JANP drawdown of -12.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and JANP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJAN | JANP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -12.18% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -5.32% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -0.90% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.02% | -0.17% |
Volatility
DJAN vs. JANP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is 1.03%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that DJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJAN | JANP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.41% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.26% | 5.52% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.62% | 6.77% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 9.07% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 9.07% | -2.15% |
DJAN vs. JANP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JANP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJAN vs. JANP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DJAN nor JANP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DJAN and JANP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JANP has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to DJAN (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs JANP's -12.18%.
On 1-year performance, JANP leads with 18.44% vs 16.14% for DJAN. On fees, JANP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JANP has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 16.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JANP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJAN.
DJAN and JANP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJAN and 0.50% for JANP.
DJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJAN and JANP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer