PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJAN vs. FAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJAN vs. FAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DJAN having a 4.13% return and FAPR slightly higher at 4.22%.


DJAN

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
4.13%
6M
4.19%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*

FAPR

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
4.22%
6M
4.27%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJAN vs. FAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DJAN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January
4.13%11.09%13.05%13.81%-5.73%3.27%
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
4.22%7.58%18.14%19.50%-10.33%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DJAN and FAPR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021

0.87

The correlation between DJAN and FAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJAN vs. FAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJAN
DJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FAPR
FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJAN vs. FAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJANFAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.57

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5.04

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

32.27

-16.08

DJAN vs. FAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FAPR Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJAN and FAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJAN vs. FAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum FAPR drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and FAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJANFAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-15.96%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-2.21%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.33%

-11.64%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-15.96%

+6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.15%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-2.69%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.34%

+0.53%

Volatility

DJAN vs. FAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is 1.78%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that DJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJANFAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

2.54%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

3.71%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

4.37%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.05%

10.53%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

10.43%

-3.51%

DJAN vs. FAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJAN and FAPR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

DJAN vs. FAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJAN nor FAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DJAN and FAPR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAPR has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to DJAN (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs FAPR's -15.96%.

On 5-year performance, FAPR leads with 8.58% vs 7.45% for DJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FAPR has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJAN and FAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

DJAN and FAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while FAPR is Defined Outcome.

FAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAN and FAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer