NVII vs. BRKC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NVII (REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF) and BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVII returned 53.28% vs -1.09% for BRKC. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NVII vs. BRKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVII achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than BRKC's -1.65% return.

NVII

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 13.34%
• 1Y: 53.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKC

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: -1.65%
• 6M: -1.55%
• 1Y: -1.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. BRKC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	12.61%	39.96%
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	-1.65%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and BRKC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

NVII vs. BRKC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII

NVII Risk / Return Rank: 45
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 39
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BRKC

BRKC Risk / Return Rank: 7
BRKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BRKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. BRKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVII	BRKC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.09	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	-0.03	+2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.00	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	-0.14	+3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	-0.29	+7.25

NVII vs. BRKC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVII Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the BRKC Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVII and BRKC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVII vs. BRKC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, which is greater than BRKC's maximum drawdown of -7.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and BRKC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVII	BRKC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.47%	-7.59%	-10.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.47%	-7.59%	-10.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.83%	-3.63%	-7.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-3.15%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.68%	3.72%	+3.96%

Volatility

NVII vs. BRKC - Volatility Comparison

REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) at 2.47%. This indicates that NVII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVII	BRKC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.92%	2.47%	+11.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.84%	9.70%	+17.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.90%	12.59%	+23.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.41%	12.49%	+22.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.41%	12.49%	+22.92%

NVII vs. BRKC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVII and BRKC have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NVII vs. BRKC - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.48%, more than BRKC's 21.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	21.08%	10.81%
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	54.48%	29.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVII and BRKC in my portfolio?

NVII and BRKC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVII or BRKC?

NVII has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to BRKC (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVII dropped -18.47% vs BRKC's -7.59%.

Which ETF is better, NVII or BRKC?

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 53.28% vs -1.09% for BRKC. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BRKC has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVII or BRKC?

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 53.28% return vs -1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVII or BRKC?

NVII and BRKC have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVII or BRKC?

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 54.48%, compared with 21.08% for BRKC.

What is the main difference between NVII and BRKC?

They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.