PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJAN vs. SPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJAN vs. SPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJAN achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPD's 7.33% return.


DJAN

1D
0.44%
1M
1.16%
6M
5.04%
YTD
6.02%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.94%

SPD

1D
1.80%
1M
1.36%
6M
6.17%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$494.74K$463.23K$645.97K
$297.15K$312.14K$351.11K

DJAN vs. SPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DJAN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January
6.02%11.09%13.05%13.81%-5.73%6.87%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
7.33%18.86%17.49%20.94%-25.96%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DJAN and SPD is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021

0.84

The correlation between DJAN and SPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJAN vs. SPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DJAN
DJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SPD
SPD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DJAN vs. SPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJANSPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.17

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.25

3.68

+11.57

DJAN vs. SPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the SPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJAN and SPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJAN vs. SPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum SPD drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and SPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJANSPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-27.38%

+17.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-11.90%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.33%

-15.18%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-27.38%

+17.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-7.56%

+5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

3.77%

-2.89%

Volatility

DJAN vs. SPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is 1.60%, while Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that DJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJANSPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

4.12%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

9.54%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

13.29%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.09%

16.18%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.91%

15.95%

-9.04%

DJAN vs. SPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPD's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJAN vs. SPD - Dividend Comparison

DJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DJAN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
0.95%0.97%1.14%1.91%1.64%0.88%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DJAN and SPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPD has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to DJAN (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs SPD's -27.38%.

On 5-year performance, DJAN leads with 7.74% vs 7.54% for SPD. On fees, SPD is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DJAN has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPD is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJAN.

SPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for DJAN.

DJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while SPD is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJAN and 0.53% for SPD.

DJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAN and SPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer