DJAN vs. NJAN
DJAN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January) and NJAN (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - DJAN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while NJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. DJAN is actively managed, while NJAN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DJAN returned 7.75%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for NJAN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DJAN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NJAN.
Performance
DJAN vs. NJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJAN achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than NJAN's 7.27% return.
DJAN
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
NJAN
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- —
DJAN vs. NJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJAN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January | 5.04% | 11.09% | 13.05% | 13.81% | -5.73% | 6.72% |
NJAN Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January | 7.27% | 14.20% | 15.35% | 20.95% | -18.92% | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJAN and NJAN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DJAN and NJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
DJAN vs. NJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DJAN
NJAN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DJAN
NJAN
Financial Services
DJAN
NJAN
Communication Services
DJAN
NJAN
Consumer Cyclical
DJAN
NJAN
Healthcare
DJAN
NJAN
Industrials
DJAN
NJAN
Consumer Defensive
DJAN
NJAN
Energy
DJAN
NJAN
Utilities
DJAN
NJAN
Real Estate
DJAN
NJAN
Basic Materials
DJAN
NJAN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJAN vs. NJAN — Risk / Return Rank
DJAN
NJAN
DJAN vs. NJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJAN | NJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.54 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.18 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.44 | 15.27 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJAN | NJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.67 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.67 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.65 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
DJAN vs. NJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum NJAN drawdown of -20.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and NJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJAN | NJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -20.70% | +11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -5.90% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.33% | -13.14% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -20.70% | +11.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.22% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -3.82% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.23% | -0.38% |
Volatility
DJAN vs. NJAN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is 0.96%, while Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that DJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJAN | NJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 1.06% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.26% | 5.72% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.61% | 7.03% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.01% | 12.29% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 12.92% | -6.00% |
DJAN vs. NJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJAN vs. NJAN - Dividend Comparison
Neither DJAN nor NJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DJAN and NJAN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJAN has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to DJAN (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs NJAN's -20.70%.
On 5-year performance, NJAN leads with 8.15% vs 7.75% for DJAN. On fees, NJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NJAN has performed better with a 8.15% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJAN.
DJAN and NJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DJAN is categorized as Options Trading, while NJAN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJAN and 0.79% for NJAN.
DJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJAN and NJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer