PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJAN vs. AJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJAN vs. AJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJAN achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than AJUL's 3.01% return.


DJAN

1D
0.19%
1M
1.86%
YTD
5.04%
6M
6.13%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*

AJUL

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.52%
YTD
3.01%
6M
3.65%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJAN vs. AJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJAN and AJUL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.84

The correlation between DJAN and AJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJAN vs. AJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJAN
DJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AJUL
AJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJAN vs. AJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJANAJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.65

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

4.17

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.44

24.60

-6.15

DJAN vs. AJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the AJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJAN and AJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJANAJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.86

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.60

-0.44

Drawdowns

DJAN vs. AJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAN drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, which is greater than AJUL's maximum drawdown of -6.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAN and AJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJANAJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-6.06%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-2.19%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.07%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-0.51%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.37%

+0.48%

Volatility

DJAN vs. AJUL - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) at 0.18%. This indicates that DJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJANAJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.18%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

2.50%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61%

3.20%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.01%

5.00%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

5.00%

+1.92%

DJAN vs. AJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJAN vs. AJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJAN nor AJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DJAN and AJUL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJAN has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to AJUL (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJAN dropped -9.57% vs AJUL's -6.06%.

On 1-year performance, DJAN leads with 15.64% vs 9.09% for AJUL. On fees, AJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DJAN has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJAN.

DJAN and AJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJAN and 0.79% for AJUL.

AJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAN and AJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer