PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJUL vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJUL vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJUL achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than AAPR's 3.82% return.


AJUL

1D
0.05%
1M
0.69%
YTD
3.08%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJUL vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AJUL and AAPR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.86

The correlation between AJUL and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJUL vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJUL
AJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJUL vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AJULAAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.99

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

12.12

-7.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.50

62.99

-38.49

AJUL vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is lower than the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJUL and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AJULAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

4.18

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.73

-0.13

Drawdowns

AJUL vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJUL drawdown since its inception was -6.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPR drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJUL and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJULAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-5.99%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.19%

-0.81%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.45%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.16%

+0.21%

Volatility

AJUL vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) is 0.17%, while Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that AJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJULAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

0.68%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

1.57%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

2.36%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.81%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.81%

+0.19%

AJUL vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AJUL and AAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

AJUL vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither AJUL nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AJUL and AAPR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPR has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to AJUL (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJUL dropped -6.06% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 9.83% vs 9.05% for AJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, AJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AJUL and AAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

AJUL and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJUL and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer