DIVZ vs. LRNZ
DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVZ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while LRNZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.64 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DIVZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.
Performance
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DIVZ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.43%
LRNZ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $843.62K | $1.68M | $1.36M | |
| $103.68K | $133.76K | $133.76K |
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 1.25% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -6.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVZ and LRNZ is -0.64, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | -0.64 |
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVZ
LRNZ
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Healthcare
DIVZ
LRNZ
Energy
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Utilities
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Industrials
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Financial Services
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Basic Materials
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Communication Services
DIVZ
LRNZ
Consumer Cyclical
DIVZ
LRNZ
-
Technology
DIVZ
LRNZ
Real Estate
DIVZ
-
LRNZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVZ vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
DIVZ
LRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVZ | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVZ drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVZ and LRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVZ | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -11.91% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -6.20% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -5.75% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | — | — |
Volatility
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVZ | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 34.30% | -24.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 34.30% | -21.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 34.30% | -21.74% |
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVZ vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison
DIVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.47% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVZ and LRNZ have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
DIVZ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LRNZ is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVZ and 0.68% for LRNZ.
Find the right allocation for DIVZ and LRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer